For those candidates who will be dealing with Tea Party Patriots... (so, pretty much all of you.)
From the Bellingham TEA Party website:
...and have an honest answer ready...
Write down the following text, and keep that text on hand at all times.
You say that and then (can't emphasize this enough) you STOP TALKING about the Constitution until prompted with a follow up question.
If a follow up question comes your way... you may add the following...
If pressed further, you could wind the topic down with something like this...
Then... and this is the most important part of all... get on with your life.
You give short direct answers that are designed to clarify where you stand and why you don't agree with the TEA Party Patriot in a respectful and honest manner. Nothing more. No winning of hearts and minds, no middle ground. There is no such thing to a TEA Party Patriot who learned the Constitution from Glenn Beck.
Those who place no value on their time will never assign any value to yours. Get in, make your point, get out.
Happy Campaigning, Kids!
(I probably should have posted this BEFORE the Tea Party Forums...)
From the Bellingham TEA Party website:
The Question That Every Politician Must Answer
Please, always remember to ask, "Where in the Constitution did We the People give you the authority to do that?" For local officials, substitute the word "constitution" with "charter". Encourage everyone you know to ask the same question. Encourage bloggers, and reporters in the mainstream media to ask the same question. Write letters to the editor asking the same question. We need this question to "go viral" nationwide.
If more and more people started asking this question, most of our worst political problems, in all branches and at all levels of government would go away by themselves, almost overnight. When a reporter asked Nancy Pelosi that question about the health care bill, her deer-in-the-headlights response was, "Are you serious?" Well, we are serious, and politicians should be afraid to step out of their offices without a credible answer to that question. That is the only "litmus test" that we need.So, expect that question...
It really takes so little effort, that it is at least worth a try. The beauty of it is, this really should appeal to honest people from anywhere on the political spectrum.
...and have an honest answer ready...
Write down the following text, and keep that text on hand at all times.
Article Three, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution.
You say that and then (can't emphasize this enough) you STOP TALKING about the Constitution until prompted with a follow up question.
If a follow up question comes your way... you may add the following...
Article 3, Section 2 includes words to the effect that "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution ..." including "to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party"Then you STOP TALKING (again, very important), until asked what the cases actually are.
The Supreme Court has resolved two such controversies which directly answer this question. Both controversies were resolved under Chief Justice John Marshall, a man appointed by Thomas Jefferson himself.
Marbury v Madison in 1803 established the basis for judicial review, and McCullogh v Maryland in 1819 established that Congress is allowed to pass laws that are not expressly provided for in the U.S. Constitution.Then you STOP TALKING about the Constitution with the Tea Party Patriot, (very tempting to go on, but resist).
These cases were resolved by Supreme Courts that were composed entirely of Justices appointed by George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison.
If pressed further, you could wind the topic down with something like this...
I've answered your question as best I can, and I gave you the most honest answer I could. We have to talk about something else now.
Then... and this is the most important part of all... get on with your life.
You give short direct answers that are designed to clarify where you stand and why you don't agree with the TEA Party Patriot in a respectful and honest manner. Nothing more. No winning of hearts and minds, no middle ground. There is no such thing to a TEA Party Patriot who learned the Constitution from Glenn Beck.
Those who place no value on their time will never assign any value to yours. Get in, make your point, get out.
Happy Campaigning, Kids!
(I probably should have posted this BEFORE the Tea Party Forums...)
The amazing thing about these tea party nitwits is they don't understand that the Constitution is designed to ALLOW govt to operate, not prevent it from operating.
ReplyDeleteThey stumble around with this vision that all those Framers--Adams, Jefferson, Madison--were in total harmonious union, absolutely lockstep agreement, with every word and section of the Constitution, an utterly harmonious document. Absurd!
They're so ignorant they don't even understand that the original "states rights" document, the Articles of Confederation, were shelved for a Federalist model of an omnipowerful statist govt, the Constitution. Was this legal under said Articles? Probably not, but it was agreed to and done. Why was it done? Because these "gods" the tea party so revere found the original articles unworkable. They could not govern a nation with the old system.
"Activist judges," my arse.
These smug tea party ignoramuses need to have their brains jostled by a baseball bat, but then you'd just end up with a sore arm and a broken bat.